RBI, MAS, FCA, SEC audit cycles that force scope cuts
Use case · Fintech
Security for teams moving money — and the auditors who watch them.
We test banking, payments, trading, and lending platforms against adversaries that understand financial abuse patterns — and we deliver evidence regulators accept.
Problem profile / 01 of 07
Banking, payments, trading, and lending platforms.
- PCI-DSS v4
- RBI CSF
- ISO 27001
- SOC 2
- MAS TRM
01 / Operating pressure
The problems in this profile.
Banking, payments, trading, and lending platforms.
01 02 Payment-rail fraud that doesn't look like CVEs
03 Third-party / BaaS integration risk opacity
04 PCI-DSS v4 scope-creep after every release
02 / Engagement design
The testing focus.
The tracks below come directly from this Fintech use-case profile.
- Track / 01
Business-logic abuse
Round-trip exploits, FX rounding, reconciliation gaps, double-spend, chargeback abuse.
- Track / 02
Account takeover
MFA fatigue, KYC bypass, number porting, recovery-flow abuse.
- Track / 03
Payment-rail testing
UPI, SWIFT, SEPA, NEFT, card schemes — real fraud scenarios, not generic API tests.
- Track / 04
Regulatory-grade reports
RBI CSF, MAS TRM, FFIEC, PCI-DSS v4, ISO 27001 alignment.
03 / Decision context
Framework context and intended outcomes.
Standards represented
Framework context
- PCI-DSS v4
- RBI CSF
- ISO 27001
- SOC 2
- MAS TRM
Profile outcomes
Intended outcomes
- Regulator-ready artifacts, not vague scanner output.
- Fraud-team-usable threat models your detection team can act on.
From profile to scope
Turn this profile into a scoped engagement.
Use the pressure points, testing tracks, framework context, and outcomes above as the agenda for a focused conversation.